California Cancer Reporting System Standards, Volume III
California Hospital Transmit
Eureka Admission Level
Eureka Tumor Level
RX Date BRM [NAACCR #1240]
RX Summ--BRM [NAACCR #1410]
RX Date BRM Flag [NAACCR #1241]
Date of Diagnosis [NAACCR #390]
IF 346: Conflict between RX Summ--BRM and RX Date BRM and RX Date BRM Flag
This edit is skipped if either of the following conditions are true:
RX Summ--BRM is blank
Both RX Date BRM and RX Date BRM Flag are blank, indicating the date was intentionally not collected.
Date of Diagnosis is blank.
Note: Another edit, "RX Date BRM, Date Flag (COC)", verifies that the date and flag fields are in agreement.
1. If RX Summ--BRM = 00, 82, or 85-87 (BRM not given) then RX Date BRM must be blank and RX Date BRM Flag field must = 11 (no BRM).
2. If RX Summ--BRM = 01 (BRM given) and RX Date BRM is blank, then RX Date BRM Flag field must indicate why the date is blank.
- If year of Date of Diagnosis is < 2012, then RX Date BRM Flag may = 10 (unknown if administered) or 12 (administered, but date is unknown).
- If year of Date of Diagnosis is 2012 or later, then RX Date BRM Flag must = 12.
3. If RX Summ--BRM = 88 (recommended, but unknown if given), then RX Date BRM Flag must indicate the reason.
- If year of Date of Diagnosis < 2012, then RX Date BRM Flag may = 10 (unknown if administered), 11 (no BRM), 12 (administered, but date is unknown), or 15 (planned, not yet given).
- If year of Date of Diagnosis is 2012 or later, then RX Date BRM Flag must = 15.
4. If RX Summ--BRM = 99 (unknown if given), then RX Date BRM Flag must = 10 (unknown if administered).
Historical Change:
2009 | Data Changes: Added 8's to IF #346 so if Date Immuno=8's then Immuno Sum cannot be 01. |
2010 | Data Changes: CCR names (Date Immuno and Immuno Sum) changed to NAACCR names. Changed logic to RX Summ--BRM, RX Date BRM (COC) edit. |
2012 | Data Changes per NAACCR v12.2
- Edit modified to only allow specific date flag codes for cases diagnosed 2012 and later. |
May 2013 |
|